Bear children school trouble parents money dispute — Jiangxi channel — people.com.cn-魔界骑士イングリッド

Bear children school trouble   parents money dispute — Jiangxi — Nanchang channel people.com.cn together "student injury claims" parents lost 2.8 yuan sentencing judge: "in the school were injured, the school should bear the main responsibility" is a kind of wrong views before the Nanchang court sentenced a collision caused by the students in the school the medical disability compensation case. Reporter noted that, in this case, bear children trouble, parents and schools have accused the court, but the court was mainly responsible for breach of students, and the school only bear secondary responsibility 20%. Some parents think: as long as students are injured in school, the school will bear the main responsibility, judgment parents lose money is very unfair. But the judge thinks this is a wrong point of view. The student campus injury case criterion Xuan introduction, small Wan and Xiao Gang is a school pupils in Nanchang city. In September 16, 2015 3 pm, during the recess, Xiao Gang in the school playground was knocked down by a small small Wan Wan, causing injuries. After the accident, Xiao Wan was sent to the hospital for 4 days, with medical expenses of 11243.8 yuan. After identification: Xiao Wan left upper limb injury was assessed as grade ten disability; follow-up treatment fee was assessed at 2000 yuan. Subsequently, small Wan Xiao Gang will and the school to Nanchang city East Lake District People’s court. The day before the court of East Lake District of Nanchang City, the case has been concluded, and the verdict. The court held that the small Wan, Xiaogang was only 8 years old, the Department of the break period, because there was no school teacher present management, small wan to Xiaogang injured disabled ten, the small Wan Xiaogang should bear the main responsibility for compensation is 80%, namely 20% schools bear secondary liability. For small department of minors, shall be the responsibility of guardians. Finally, the court decision, a one-time compensation of 500 yuan small Wan school and parents; Xiaogang small Wan one-time compensation 28633.44 yuan; the insurance company a one-time compensation of 6658.36 yuan small wan. Over 60% injured by playing "before us court also accepted together with similar cases, two of the second grade students in the primary school classroom corridor game play, one of the pupils knock off incisors." Nanchang city East Lake district court staff told reporters, in adjudicating cases, sitting on the dock of the parents of children, children playing during recess occurred the race each other accidentally bumps can hardly be avoided, wrestling knock off incisors should be responsible for their own. But in the end, the court decided that the defendant’s parents should bear 50% of the compensation liability, and the school should bear the 30% responsibility. The reporter found by querying the Jiangxi court case information, the past two years, around the campus injury occurred in the incident has reached dozens, the incident, between students playing, such as the case of Donghu District Court; there are defects of safety education, school facilities are not in place, such as high security, city court previously concluded, the second grade primary school arrange duty, this period was the window broken glass hurt caused by seven disability, the court school bear Jiucheng responsibility. The reporter combing the dozens on campus injury cases between students’ playing cause damage and make to the court of claims for medical expenses, more than 60%. Is the school responsible for the injury? ) 熊孩子学校惹祸 父母赔钱引争议–江西频道–人民网 南昌一起“在校生受伤索赔案”宣判 家长赔了2.8万余元 法官:“在学校受伤,学校就要担主要责任”是一种错误观点 日前,南昌法院宣判一起学生在学校发生碰撞引发的医疗伤残赔偿案。记者注意到,这起案件中,“熊孩子”惹祸后,家长及学校均被告上法院,但有过错方的学生被法院判决承担主要责任,而学校只承担20%次要责任。一些家长认为:只要是学生在学校受伤,学校就要担主要责任,判决家长赔钱很冤。但法官认为,这是一种错误的观点。 学生校园受伤案宣判 据介绍,小婉与小刚都是南昌市某学校的小学生。 2015年9月16日下午3时许,课间休息期间,小刚在学校操场撞倒了小婉,造成小婉受伤。事故发生后,小婉被送至医院住院治疗4天,用去医疗费11243.8元。经鉴定:小婉左上肢损伤评定为十级伤残;后续治疗费评定为2000元。 随后,小婉将小刚及学校告上南昌市东湖区人民法院。 日前,南昌市东湖区法院对此案已经审结,并作出一审判决。法院认为,小婉、小刚事发时年仅8周岁,事发系课间休息期间,因学校没有老师在场管理,小刚撞伤小婉并致其伤残十级,故小刚应对小婉承担主要赔偿责任即80%,学校承担次要赔偿责任即20%。因小刚系未成年人,依法应由其监护人承担责任。最终,法院判决,学校一次性赔偿小婉500元;小刚及其父母一次性赔偿小婉28633.44元;保险公司一次性赔偿小婉6658.36元。 超六成伤害因嬉戏打闹 “之前我们法院还受理过一起类似案例,两名小学二年级学生在教室走廊上游戏玩闹,其中一名小学生磕断门牙。”南昌市东湖区法院工作人员告诉记者,在审理案件时,坐在被告席上的小孩家长认为,小孩课间玩耍你追我赶发生磕磕碰碰在所难免,其不小心摔跤磕断门牙应自行负责。但最终,法院判决,被告家长承担50%的赔偿责任,而学校承担30%责任。 记者通过查询江西法院网案件信息发现,这两年来,各地发生在校园伤害事件已达数十起,事发原因,有学生之间嬉戏打闹的,如东湖区法院审理的这起案件;也有学校设施缺陷、安全教育不到位等,如,高安市法院此前审结一起,学校安排二年级小学生值日,此期间被窗户破碎玻璃戳伤致七级伤残,法院判决学校承担九成责任。 记者对这数十起发生在校园里的伤害案件进行梳理,发现学生之间嬉戏打闹引发伤害并闹至法院索赔医疗费的,超过六成。 在校受伤学校担主责? “我们在审理此类伤害赔偿案件中发现,作为被告的学生家长,往往都会强调,‘只要是学生在学校受伤的,学校就一定要承担主要责任’,可法律并不是这么规定的。”一名法官告诉记者。 哪些情况学校要担主要责任?有资深法官分析道,比如,学校的校舍、场地等不符合国家标准或者有明显不安全因素;教师或其他工作人员体罚、殴打、辱骂学生、批评方法不当;学校组织学生参加教育活动或者校外活动,未对学生进行相应的安全教育,并未在可预见的范围内采取必要的安全措施等。 法官还指出,学生有特定疾病、异常心理状态或者特异体质,学校不知道或难以知道,在体育运动中受到伤害的,属意外事件,应属校方免责事由。因为该情形已超出学校的预见能力,学校在事故发生方面无过错,不具有可归责性。如果学校在事故的发展阶段,对受害学生的施救等方面无过错的,则不承担责任。(张涛 刘媛 记者叶伟) (责编:帅筠、邱烨)相关的主题文章: